Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 12:44:47 +0300 From: Pavel Timofeev <timp87@gmail.com> To: ports-list freebsd <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: squid default options Message-ID: <CAAoTqftSvFDp7oBUj2GY0E6aSb2Fb-F81-h=zEeOHNLkwGc8wA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! I'm a maintainer of squid port and I'd like to ask you about default squid options turned on by default. Squid 4 is in release candidate stage now and we already have an initial port for it here https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203860. So, how do you think, what options should be turned on by default? I think the main idea should be if option doesn't invoke any additional dependency it should be turned on. However, there are options like TP_{IPF,IPFW,PF} which mean 'Transparent proxying with {IPF,IPFW,PF}'. They don't invoke any dependency. If you have GENERIC kernel and world, of course. Well, I know, we can't satisfy everyone, so default option set have to be guided by common sense and appropriate for the most. But there are FreeBSD based OSs like pfSense, FreeNAS, etc.. Should we think/care about them? To be honest I've never used them. I can misunderstand something. Same story with GSSAPI_BASE. It needs kerberos from base system, that can absent in others FreeBSD bases OSs.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAAoTqftSvFDp7oBUj2GY0E6aSb2Fb-F81-h=zEeOHNLkwGc8wA>