Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 22:55:17 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 292089] math/manifold: Improve port Message-ID: <bug-292089-7788-eu7Otwe9tn@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-292089-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=292089 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Engberg <diizzy@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Shane from comment #2) See https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/book/#makefile-master_sites-github 1: https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/book/#dads-cflags (I missed linking to it initially) Apply that argument to the tree in general and the amount of computing power used for accomplishing nothing, this is why we should care. I'm not sure why you'd use else in this case, nothing in the tree uses this approach and makes it more backwards? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-292089-7788-eu7Otwe9tn>
