Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 20:23:03 -0400 From: "Jeroen C. van Gelderen" <jeroen@vangelderen.org> To: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Message-ID: <393C4467.3AD535D4@vangelderen.org> References: <200006052351.QAA00547@mass.cdrom.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Mike Smith wrote:
>
> > > and if a module wants to unload itself due to
> > > "unuse", it can already do so.
> >
> > You wouldn't have control over that process if the modules decides
> > for itself. It's a sysadmin decision to unload modules, not the
> > module's decision.
>
> So why introduce a third party? ("kerneld") If the admin wants to
> remove a module, great.
That was the point I was trying to make. If the admin wants to
remove modules manually he can do so. If he wants to have it
happen periodically he can set up a cron job to do it. You would
just need to add an option to kldunload that unloads all unused
modules. You didn't read very well, I never promoted "kerneld".
This last comment referred to
> and if a module wants to unload itself due to
> "unuse", it can already do so.
because modules should not unload themselves, it's up to the
admin to decide.
Cheers,
Jeroen
--
Jeroen C. van Gelderen o _ _ _
jeroen@vangelderen.org _o /\_ _ \\o (_)\__/o (_)
_< \_ _>(_) (_)/<_ \_| \ _|/' \/
(_)>(_) (_) (_) (_) (_)' _\o_
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?393C4467.3AD535D4>