Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 17:23:41 -0500 From: "Zane C.B." <v.velox@vvelox.net> To: Charlie Kester <corky1951@comcast.net> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Popularity Message-ID: <20100702172341.1704b478@vixen42.vulpes.vvelox.net> In-Reply-To: <20100301010620.GB2894@comcast.net> References: <4B8ABAB3.1060003@gamozo.org> <20100228185353.GA4307@apollo.podro.com> <201003010026.RAA21457@lariat.net> <20100301010620.GB2894@comcast.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/fYHK0DOn2UYSU=P165Gjjqa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 17:06:21 -0800 Charlie Kester <corky1951@comcast.net> wrote: > No, it's more than the GPL licensing, although that's bad enough. >=20 > GNU software is often bloated. Way too many commandline switches > (using an overly verbose syntax). Feature creep everywhere, not > just on the commandline.=20 >=20 > It runs counter to the basic Unix philosophy of small, cooperating > programs, each doing one thing and doing it well. >=20 > If you don't understand that there's an aesthetic aspect to Unix, > you'll miss what a lot of people are complaining about with GNUish > stuff. General to me it has felt to be the complete opposite. In that they are fairly feature barren to what exists for FreeBSD. --Sig_/fYHK0DOn2UYSU=P165Gjjqa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkwuZvMACgkQqrJJy0yxYQDZLQCfRvlooo+mrhslwO2ZqvIZIBRO ucMAnjWmAWvMsgZKQJFW4aNNsRjbMBfX =oLhy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/fYHK0DOn2UYSU=P165Gjjqa--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100702172341.1704b478>