Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:06:26 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Chris Hedley <cbh-freebsd-current@groups.chrishedley.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Crash with new bind/host cmds on -CURRENT (poss. runq_remove?) Message-ID: <20041020020626.GB26615@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20041020023318.T866@teapot.cbhnet> References: <20041018202949.J866@teapot.cbhnet> <20041019160026.GB55255@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041019212009.GA93330@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041019231815.GA7266@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041020003333.H866@teapot.cbhnet> <4175BABD.70602@gamersimpact.com> <20041020023318.T866@teapot.cbhnet>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 02:41:04AM +0100, Chris Hedley wrote: > On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Ryan Sommers wrote: > >Are you using PREEMPT with SHED_ULE? Or is this just SHED_ULE without=20 > >preemption? >=20 > I have both SCHED_ULE and PREEMPTION set in my config file, which I've=20 > included as an attachment "just in case" (please don't laugh at how=20 > scruffy it's become!) Aargh..you'd think people would have got the idea by now that SCHED_ULE is broken, especially with PREEMPTION! Kris --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBdcgiWry0BWjoQKURAuIoAJ0YsFnJIEc70LS0gZYzvWjpZUt/KQCffIrf wBnUr+2nfvSgRMyOSi9K1WI= =xede -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041020020626.GB26615>