Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 14:15:25 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@iafrica.com> To: Mike Thompson <miket@dnai.com> Cc: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, Gary Gaskell <gaskell@isrc.qut.edu.au>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Kerberos vs SSH Message-ID: <375.922364125@axl.noc.iafrica.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 24 Mar 1999 23:41:01 PST." <4.1.19990324233231.00a02e40@mail.dnai.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 24 Mar 1999 23:41:01 PST, Mike Thompson wrote: > Are you refering to SSH v1 or SSH v2, or do both compile > with Kerberos in the manner you describe? Why are you so interested in ssh2? It's a totally different piece of software from a different vendor. Are you sure it does something that you need done, and which ssh1 doesn't do just fine? > I am currently looking into what the licensing costs would be > for us to license SSH v2 for our servers. Does BEST.COM pay > to license SSH v1 or SSH v2 for internal use? There are no licensing costs involved in using ssh1. > I'll investigate Kerberos V in the ports. By using Kerberos I assume > it gives you the advantage of configuring all ssh authentication and > passwords on the Kerberos server? Not exactly. All your Kerberos passwords are on the Kerberos server. However, sshd configuration still needs to be host-specific. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?375.922364125>