Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 10:20:19 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Thomas Hoffmann <trh411@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, daniel dallmann <djdallmann@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Processes and Daemons Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1403021012540.15399@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <CAB7-odn0QkW3Beqx4Xj6m1yeWCqCtYjWQY2ZVq_wZ7TnOWwGcA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CALGz73gxqgyv8KXOom0PUC9-F76cFX9H4bsq-jj%2BwaG2VqShig@mail.gmail.com> <CAB7-odn0QkW3Beqx4Xj6m1yeWCqCtYjWQY2ZVq_wZ7TnOWwGcA@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014, Thomas Hoffmann wrote: > On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 4:10 PM, daniel dallmann <djdallmann@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I was wondering if the output from top was displayed with two headers on >> purpose? >> >> http://www.za.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/basics-processes.html > > > I'm guessing yes. The first is without ZFS stats (5 lines), the second with > ZFS stats (6 lines). The text describes the 'top' heading as being 5 or 6 > lines. So these two header formats are the two users will encounter, > depending on their use or non-use of ZFS. If intentional, it's a bit misleading. Better to show just one more realistically and note that the output will vary depending on the individual system. It does not seem necessary mention ZFS specifically.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1403021012540.15399>