Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:26:56 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Oliver Lehmann <lehmann@ans-netz.de> Cc: re@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: problem with debug.mpsafenet (was: Problems with ANA-6944A + 5.3-BETA + IRQ sharing?) Message-ID: <200409281226.56079.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20040927212341.44986dbd.lehmann@ans-netz.de> References: <20040926190709.251f1689.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <20040926221518.445a525b.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <20040927212341.44986dbd.lehmann@ans-netz.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 27 September 2004 03:23 pm, Oliver Lehmann wrote: > Ok, > > I tried now 3 FreeBSD versions. > > Setup: > PI-166MHz, 64MB RAM > de0 irq9 @ANA-6944A > de1 10.0.0.60 irq9 @ANA-6944A > de2 10.0.1.60 irq9 @ANA-6944A > de3 irq9 @ANA-6944A > xl0 irq12 > xl1 irq10 > ep0 irq5 > ep1 irq7 > /mnt/files is a nfs mount from 10.0.0.21 > 3 * ssh sessions from 10.0.1.51 to 10.0.1.60 > 2 * dd if=/mnt/files/dill_dd of=/dev/null > 1 * ping 10.0.1.51 running > > > 5.3-BETA6 (GENERIC Kernel): > > Everything looked fine (exept same slowness as 5.2.1) for a while (~9min). > 400736256 bytes transferred in 546.111599 secs (733799 bytes/sec) > 414572544 bytes transferred in 565.398805 secs (733239 bytes/sec) > > But as I started a ping -f from 10.0.1.51 to 10.0.0.60. The ping times > from 10.0.1.60 to 10.0.1.51 went up, and didn't renormalized after I break > the ping -f > > 64 bytes from 10.0.1.51: icmp_seq=355 ttl=64 time=4.039 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.1.51: icmp_seq=356 ttl=64 time=4.801 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.1.51: icmp_seq=357 ttl=64 time=6.702 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.1.51: icmp_seq=358 ttl=64 time=9.290 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.1.51: icmp_seq=359 ttl=64 time=10.543 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.1.51: icmp_seq=360 ttl=64 time=9.989 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.1.51: icmp_seq=361 ttl=64 time=25.966 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.1.51: icmp_seq=362 ttl=64 time=25.262 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.1.51: icmp_seq=363 ttl=64 time=27.746 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.1.51: icmp_seq=364 ttl=64 time=30.859 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.1.51: icmp_seq=365 ttl=64 time=31.507 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.1.51: icmp_seq=366 ttl=64 time=35.783 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.1.51: icmp_seq=367 ttl=64 time=29295.367 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.1.51: icmp_seq=368 ttl=64 time=28288.204 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.1.51: icmp_seq=369 ttl=64 time=27279.969 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.1.51: icmp_seq=370 ttl=64 time=26274.269 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.1.51: icmp_seq=371 ttl=64 time=25267.441 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.1.51: icmp_seq=372 ttl=64 time=24260.161 ms > .... > > > After that, I added debug.mpsafenet=0 to /boot/loader.conf and rebooted > the system. I did the same as above. (2dd's, one ping from 10.0.1.60 to > 10.0.1.51, and one ping -f from 10.0.1.51 to 10.0.1.60.) > The ping times from 10.0.1.60 -> 10.0.1.51 went a bit up (~0.3ms -> 0.6 - > 1ms), but nothing else happend. dd finished w/o errors, no strange things > happend. (running now for ~20 mins w/o problems) > > > For me, It looks like there is a problem with mpsafenet! > Any help/patches to test/information requests/.... appreciated. The problem appears to be in the de(4) driver and there are numerous reports of that specific driver having problems. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200409281226.56079.jhb>