Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:48:59 +0300
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Gavin Atkinson <gavin@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r212964 - head/sys/kern
Message-ID:  <4C9B68DB.9010401@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <201009230953.56201.jhb@freebsd.org>
References:  <201009211507.o8LF7iVv097676@svn.freebsd.org> <4C9A6EE6.5050301@freebsd.org> <20100922222441.00002f27@unknown> <201009230953.56201.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 23/09/2010 16:53 John Baldwin said the following:
> minidumps have made the time issue less of a concern on large-memory systems 
> (full dumps do indeed take a long time on modern systems).  I think textdumps 
> are just as likely to fail as regular dumps though since they both use the 
> same code for writing out the dump, they just write different bits to the dump 
> area.

Well, minidumps are not always very small.
And there's still that issue of other CPUs still running during panic->dumping and
thus (mini-)dump maps getting changed (larger) after dump size calculations which
results in an aborted dump.

-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C9B68DB.9010401>