Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 28 Oct 2012 14:34:40 -0700
From:      Rui Paulo <rpaulo@felyko.com>
To:        Andre Oppermann <andre@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r242261 - head/sys/netinet
Message-ID:  <6FC10C06-9288-4E2C-A1A2-33C5CC8086C5@felyko.com>
In-Reply-To: <201210281902.q9SJ272D078237@svn.freebsd.org>
References:  <201210281902.q9SJ272D078237@svn.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28 Oct 2012, at 12:02, Andre Oppermann <andre@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> Author: andre
> Date: Sun Oct 28 19:02:07 2012
> New Revision: 242261
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/242261
>=20
> Log:
>  For retransmits of SYN|ACK from the syncache use the slightly more
>  aggressive special tcp_syn_backoff[] retransmit schedule instead of
>  the normal tcp_backoff[] schedule for established connections.


How did you came up with the values for tcp_syn_backoff? I obviously =
understand the aggressiveness, but did you measure any significant =
improvement in connection establishment time and if so, on what type of =
links?

Regards,
--
Rui Paulo




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6FC10C06-9288-4E2C-A1A2-33C5CC8086C5>