Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:49:20 +0000 From: Igor Mozolevsky <igor@hybrid-lab.co.uk> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD has serious problems with focus, longevity, and lifecycle Message-ID: <CADWvR2hqM6KEXqb7HY2K6AenOuDL4r0=L_b__G96xzX9-0dwWw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <jf3u0f$8pv$1@dough.gmane.org> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1112211415580.19710@kozubik.com> <1326756727.23485.10.camel@Arawn> <4F14BAA7.9070707@freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201161606230.19710@kozubik.com> <20120117010239.GA29529@richh-imac.office.boxdice.com.au> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1201171931120.21214@oreo.lan> <jf3u0f$8pv$1@dough.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 17 January 2012 13:44, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 17/01/2012 07:32, Atom Smasher wrote: >> >> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, richo wrote: >> >>> This would be a different argument if all the devs were paid a salary. >> >> ============== >> >> what percentage of linux devs are on salary to develop linux? > > Apparently, 3/4: http://apcmag.com/linux-now-75-corporate.htm Actually, you're misrepresenting the facts: according to the headline, 75% of the code came from paid developers, *not* 75% of developers are paid... See the difference?.. -- Igor M.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADWvR2hqM6KEXqb7HY2K6AenOuDL4r0=L_b__G96xzX9-0dwWw>