Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 02:46:52 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why 6.0-current? Message-ID: <xzp8yc8rocj.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20040820191459.GA1422@laptoxa.toxa.lan> (postfix@senmail.ru's message of "Fri, 20 Aug 2004 23:14:59 %2B0400") References: <20040819185710.GA659@laptoxa.toxa.lan> <20040820101933.G73388@carver.gumbysoft.com> <20040820191459.GA1422@laptoxa.toxa.lan>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Toxa <postfix@senmail.ru> writes:
> Actually I do read :). But this moment was missed by me as far as
> you can see. RELENG_4 is 4-stable, RELENG_5 is 5-stable, but I
> stupidly thought that HEAD is one step forward from
> RELENG_5_X_RELEASE (e.g., if we have 5.4-release then current is
> 5.5-current, preparing for 5.5-release, becoming 5.6-current after
> 5.5-release is out, etc)
You are extrapolating from too little data. This article may help you
understand better:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/releng/
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.no
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp8yc8rocj.fsf>