Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:11:08 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no> Cc: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern init_main.c kern_descrip.c sys_pipe.c uipc_syscalls.c uipc_usrreq.c vfs_syscalls.c src/sys/sys filedesc.h Message-ID: <20040115191108.GB3693@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <xzp1xq113gc.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <200401151015.i0FAF49u009868@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040115111219.GA20914@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <xzpwu7tignh.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040115101021.L71463@root.org> <xzp1xq113gc.fsf@dwp.des.no>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 07:17:39PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> writes: > > A related question, why wasn't sys/bitstring.h used? > > I had no idea it existed... it also seems (to my eyes) suboptimal as > it uses arrays of bytes instead of long. Could you rerun your benchmark using it so we have consistency in the tree?help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040115191108.GB3693>