Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:51:00 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> Cc: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HTTPS on freebsd.org, git, reproducible builds Message-ID: <3047.1442580660@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <1442578892.1807598.387215049.07156D0F@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <CAD2Ti2_YNkNi2b=PzFCwu3PVaP8hOzADys3=-k0AqvsDRhJpzA@mail.gmail.com> <1442578892.1807598.387215049.07156D0F@webmail.messagingengine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-------- In message <1442578892.1807598.387215049.07156D0F@webmail.messagingengine.= com>, Mark Felder writes: >There are two different opinions on this matter throughout the project: > >* Encrypt all the things >* Encrypt what is necessary I can recommend the book "Command & Control" as a very interesting introduction to the value of "proportional response defense". The War On Privacy will not be won by putting HTTP on totally public information like FreeBSD.org, it is a political issue.. The only way to win political issues, is to engage in politics. That means voting for the right politicians. If no candidates are suitable, inspire people to become candidates. If that fails too: Become a candidate yourself. If you feel you have more important things to do than engange in politics, then you will have to live with the consequences. -- = Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe = Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence= .
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3047.1442580660>