Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 07:41:56 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Clang Message-ID: <201206221241.q5MCfuZG041722@mail.r-bonomi.com> In-Reply-To: <op.wf9kla1734t2sn@tech304>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jun 21 12:46:15 2012 > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:37:48 -0500 > From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> > Cc: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> > Subject: Re: Why Clang > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:36:03 -0500, Wojciech Puchar > <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > > > > > But why anyone from FreeBSD fundation didn't just write official letter > > to GNU "Free" Software Foundation asking for just that case? > > There needs to be a lawsuit and lawyers and judges need to be involved. > You can't just ask the FSF to "explain" themselves. You _can_ ask. The response just doesn't 'mean anything' -- the actual language of the 'license' takes precedence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201206221241.q5MCfuZG041722>