Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:40:58 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor_K=F6vesd=E1n?= <gabor@FreeBSD.org> To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r188006 - in head/usr.bin: basename dirname Message-ID: <4986DBCA.5000501@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20090202113141.GH1230@hoeg.nl> References: <200902021119.n12BJva6095787@svn.freebsd.org> <20090202113141.GH1230@hoeg.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ed Schouten escribió: > Hi Robert, > > * Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > >> - (void)fprintf(stderr, "usage: dirname string\n"); >> + (void)fprintf(stderr, "usage: dirname string [...]\n"); >> > > Maybe we shouldn't use brackets here, like rm(1): > > usage: rm [-f | -i] [-dIPRrvW] file ... > I'd prefer if we used brackets with rm(1), as well. Even if these syntax descriptions aren't BNFs, the brackets are usually used to denote optionality. -- Gabor Kovesdan EMAIL: gabor@FreeBSD.org WWW: http://www.kovesdan.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4986DBCA.5000501>