Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 21:00:04 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Expensive timeout(9) function ? Message-ID: <20040104205911.S77465@carver.gumbysoft.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0401041820230.54854@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0401041820230.54854@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > Hi, > > what reports do you expect with the > > "Expensive timeout(9) function" > > message ? Why do we see it ? You compiled your kernel with 'options DIAGNOSTIC'. Unless you have an explicit reason for doing so, you should not use this option. -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040104205911.S77465>