Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 09:20:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/66892: possible bug in philosophy of ports/MOVED Message-ID: <200405191620.i4JGKIQf053704@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/66892; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, dan@langille.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/66892: possible bug in philosophy of ports/MOVED Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 18:15:06 +0200 Mark Linimon wrote: > I guess I can work around this in portsmon ... somehow. But > shouldn't there be some kind of notation added to MOVED when > something gets reintroduced? (I can imagine this problem > affecting FreshPorts as well). Yep. I don't know what to check for in MOVEDlint, and I'm not sure what the proper semantics are: has OpenLDAP 2.0 moved to OpenLDAP 2.1, or is it simply deleted? We have to clarify that for MOVED to be useful for automated tools. -Oliver
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200405191620.i4JGKIQf053704>