Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 22:34:47 +0000 From: krad <kraduk@googlemail.com> To: Gary Kline <kline@thought.org> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: which filrs/directories must be chowned bind? Message-ID: <d36406630912051434w45f46dd5m83b054fb982753fa@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20091205222859.GA49341@thought.org> References: <20091205064419.GA46204@thought.org> <d36406630912051409x1fcb8841sfecbcaf7fcd33033@mail.gmail.com> <20091205222859.GA49341@thought.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/12/5 Gary Kline <kline@thought.org> > On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 10:09:24PM +0000, krad wrote: > > 2009/12/5 Gary Kline <kline@thought.org> > > > > > > > > I've just finished getting > > > > > > % nslookup 10.47.0.230 > > > > > > to respond, so at least my test configuration is finally right > > > ... or on the right track. I am not certain that I ever had > > > things chowned bind:bind; even before my '07 meltdown. Now > > > it's time to make certain that every file that should be owned > > > by bind really *is*. > > > > > > Anybody? > > > > > > > > Have a look at /etc/mtree/BIND.chroot.dist > > also dont use nslookup use host or dig. NSlookup is dodgy > > > Re nslookup, it is still widely enough used that it ain't dead > yet. But, yeah, I just found a tutorial-like page on dig. > It's helpful for a utility that isn't that friendly. > > thanks for the mtree tip. > > -- > Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service > Unix > http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org > The 7.31a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php > > it gives dodgy results under some conditions and is actually more clunky to work with
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d36406630912051434w45f46dd5m83b054fb982753fa>