Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:01:10 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@FreeBSD.org> Cc: pkg@FreeBSD.org, python@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: incorrect dependency registration? Message-ID: <20140929080109.GI40373@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <15E556C8-EEB6-4218-93F3-F76BFA2E4F29@FreeBSD.org> References: <15E556C8-EEB6-4218-93F3-F76BFA2E4F29@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:52:50AM +0400, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: > Hello, > > I am using FreeBSD-10/stable and pkg-1.3.8. > > Consider py-dateutil port, it depends on py-six. > > First, I installed py33-dateutil (with py33-six), for python3. > > Now I install py-dateutil for python2. Upon installation, I get the following waring: > ===> Installing for py27-dateutil-2.2 > ===> py27-dateutil-2.2 depends on package: py27-six>0 - found > ===> py27-dateutil-2.2 depends on package: py27-setuptools27>0 - found > ===> py27-dateutil-2.2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - found > ===> Checking if py27-dateutil already installed > ===> Registering installation for py27-dateutil-2.2 > pkg-static: py27-dateutil-2.2: duplicate dependency listing: py33-six-1.5.2, ignoring > > When I try to deinstall py27-six, I get: > > # pkg delete py27-six > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > Deinstallation has been requested for the following 3 packages (of 0 packages in the universe): > > Installed packages to be REMOVED: > py27-six-1.8.0 > py33-dateutil-2.1_3 (depends on py27-six-1.8.0) > py27-dateutil-2.2 (depends on py27-six-1.8.0) > > The operation will free 1 MB. > > Proceed with deinstalling packages? [y/N]: > > (it wants to deinstall both versions of py-dateutil). > > Something looks broken here. > > Some time ago it did not let to install the same port for different python version, now it is possible but deps registration looks broken. I do not have time for this right now, I'll see in a couple of days, but CCing parties that should be interested :) regards, Bapt [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQpEcUACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ex8CACeJiwKh9po3i+li/Tj2mgmv5cc JzUAn0b5fNDvTnQ+JUCRwbPu5MvSEg6l =oUm5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140929080109.GI40373>