Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:50:05 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=E9?= <olivier@cochard.me> To: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Dieter BSD <dieterbsd@engineer.com> Subject: Re: Maximum blocksize for FFS? Message-ID: <CA%2Bq%2BTcrZeO6-Xj32aXpwP1HTJv0BrUdRYmjN5=3Vw54i4rs92A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201112131818.pBDIIlPm071707@chez.mckusick.com> References: <20111213091457.GU50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <201112131818.pBDIIlPm071707@chez.mckusick.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com> wrote: > The default blocksize in FreeBSD 9.0 is 32K/4K. We have been > running with this size in -current for a almost a year with no > reported problems. Hi, There is a reported problem: The number of inode was divided by two with FreeBSD 9.0 (PR bin/162659) and this create some problems because "the number of fragments per inode (NFPI) was not adapted to the new default block size" (Bruce Evans'explanation [1]). Regards, Olivier [1] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2011-December/046713.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2Bq%2BTcrZeO6-Xj32aXpwP1HTJv0BrUdRYmjN5=3Vw54i4rs92A>