Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:36:13 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com>, Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?] Message-ID: <p06110413bd9c98465661@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <4176E329.9090500@portaone.com> References: <41767CF1.2020005@FreeBSD.org> <20041020.105839.100358845.imp@bsdimp.com> <20041020170907.GA1216@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <200410201913.42879.max@love2party.net> <20041020194547.GD2195@ip.net.ua> <4176C0C8.4060408@freebsd.org> <4176E329.9090500@portaone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 1:14 AM +0300 10/21/04, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > >OK, I've just checked objcopy manpage and found that there is >actually a better way which combines best properties of both >approach. In modern GNU toolchain it is possible to split >executable and debugging info into two separate files, but put >a reference into executable, so that you don't have to worry >about how to load debugging symbols: This sounds like a very attractive possibility. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p06110413bd9c98465661>