Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:44:16 +0100 From: Monthadar Al Jaberi <monthadar@gmail.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy@yahoo.ca>, freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] serialising net80211 TX Message-ID: <CA%2BsBSo%2B_K6s==AVik%2BfOCir4fTmrjebaXiwvoZyBHmqpKNKT6A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmok7GjrB3K3wLrkN1y4%2BNCEgb%2BLYd2FMpyAuXDrK8hZr6g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAFZ_MYJjV=5FtEmWkO7rRBtAuvn2R0Ec=O0ojhPxBfcBuLRUJQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonAXBxuD51y-j5PEt4uGHO_EX15C3inj9wTmR%2BJnb21LA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFZ_MYLswF_3OvEg=uc5GXUAi=EipXmqj-cAWjRC9xi93V-R1Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmon%2BuSKwkEkeiUsC=Gh%2Bk=uVpZdXM5kTKtP_cmfBD0nwjg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmomMnZ7EM=bgS9NpM_pYDaLQxFg5k2vd7vrdEa4oYx3XNw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmo=g5F06dY0p9mOYxY_%2Bh1bLNdQ7%2BukQToU5eb4E%2BNuBuA@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BsBSoJZ0uQm_M_OZ-eOSCVFtvu7DeboE28JNbLrY15BTcRRhA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmo=sJ3Qh8VU%2B99bNr-a3wm5E6e9c=O_qy3w-6ERkVGj5MA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmomHCz2nEd-GEh2JKoYbfAdsG0xYbAt=j-BqW6D5jHxMeQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmon=SdO66j99dEPT1uSqhmJoNPYVexy-PT0__XTX3My%2BTQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BsBSoKpHGSYQBM3xvmOEMayq0iXi9L6O5UjUXUqw=1-bknxnQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmok7GjrB3K3wLrkN1y4%2BNCEgb%2BLYd2FMpyAuXDrK8hZr6g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 19 February 2013 07:50, Monthadar Al Jaberi <monthadar@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> Here's my current patch. I've tested it lightly in AP mode. >> >> Its identical to 20130216-net80211-tx-lock-2.diff? >> > > Good. That means I haven't accidentally changed anything since the > last diff. :-) Good then I dont need to re-apply ;) I have tested between two meshSTAand run iperf UDP until I get close to getting lost packets. Current FreeBSD (r246983): 17 Mbits/ Current FreeBSD (r246983) + with your patch: 15 Mbit/s Good news no panic! But looks like a bit slower. I should add I have noticed before that mesh is slower than other modes. br, > > I'm using that on my test (open) AP at the moment. Nothing that uses > active powersave is actually using it yet though. > > Thanks, > > > > adrian -- Monthadar Al Jaberi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BsBSo%2B_K6s==AVik%2BfOCir4fTmrjebaXiwvoZyBHmqpKNKT6A>