Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 07:51:10 -0400 From: Kim Culhan <w8hdkim@gmail.com> To: PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy@yahoo.ca> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (ANother) stall fixed, please update to HEAD Message-ID: <CAKZxVQXEDAD8KtR2%2B3TgxYEbGkuObahfOz8KoG76swO4F%2BQvKQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAFZ_MYL%2BPJp=fZGY3HUuL%2BLtMGh1QaAMrEZsoig5sKoV=ESs=w@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:32 AM, PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy@yahoo.ca> wrote: > iter.path only print outs debug message when the array overflowed > (most unlikely it will). At this moment, this is what we need. > > iter2.patch does iter.patch + revert changes + abort iterating just > for piece of mind. Probably this is unnecessary. The code need to be > patched in the way the array won't overflow if it ever happens. (I > leave it to committers what to commit.) > > The attached patch can be applied over iter.patch > > Sorry for the confusion. Its no problem, applied iter + addon and rebuilding now, thanks for doing this :) thanks -kimhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAKZxVQXEDAD8KtR2%2B3TgxYEbGkuObahfOz8KoG76swO4F%2BQvKQ>