Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 18:00:20 +0530 From: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@physics.iisc.ernet.in> To: j mckitrick <jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org> Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux kernel and FreeBSD neck and neck? Message-ID: <20000728180020.A13337@physics.iisc.ernet.in> In-Reply-To: <20000728131956.B58850@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>; from jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org on Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 01:19:56PM %2B0100 References: <20000728124727.A58850@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20000728173235.A13136@physics.iisc.ernet.in> <20000728131956.B58850@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
j mckitrick said on Jul 28, 2000 at 13:19:56: > > I've seen on machines I've used, 2.2 definitely isn't as good at > > memory management as FreeBSD either. > > That's true. BSD's venerable memory management is one area that seems to be > a stronghold. I don't know about venerable: I read somewhere that a lot of the FreeBSD improvements are recent and due to Matt Dillon, and also that he's talking to Alan Cox of linux and eventually the memory management of FreeBSD and Linux may "merge"... I can't remember where I read this latter bit or how reliable the source may have been. But Alan Cox is an admirer of FreeBSD and runs it on one machine, and often mentions it in interviews. R. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000728180020.A13337>