Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Jun 2011 08:21:03 -0500
From:      Stacey Son <sson@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Lev Serebryakov <lev@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-security@freebsd.org, developers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: OpenBSM: does somebody work on it?
Message-ID:  <A945E553-0D06-4AF3-A855-B169F6D882D9@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <1191160420.20110629145915@serebryakov.spb.ru>
References:  <1191160420.20110629145915@serebryakov.spb.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Jun 29, 2011, at 5:59 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:

> Hello, Freebsd-security.
> 
>  I'm trying to use audit, and has some problems. First one is
> impossiblity to create custom event class, and second one I hit is
> with auditreduce(1)
> 
>  auditreduce doesn't filter events by date (-b/-a/-d options with any
> arguments produces empty output), it doesn't merge files properly and
> doesn't pick up files automagically, as Solaris' one does. It doesn't
> have -C/-M/-O functionality of Solaris' one, too. So, proper merging
> of audit trial files seems to be impossible :(
> 
>  I could try to fix & extend auditreduce(1), but does somebdy but me
> need it?
> 
>  Does somebody use audit on FreeBSD on production systems?


FYI, a better place to discuss this would be the trustedbsd-audit mailing list.  There are quite of few people that use OpenBSM in production on FreeBSD and Mac OS X that hang out on that list usually.

Regards,

-stacey.


Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A945E553-0D06-4AF3-A855-B169F6D882D9>