Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 20:27:34 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Chagin Dmitry <dchagin@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r283424 - in head/sys: amd64/linux modules/linux64 Message-ID: <20150525172734.GR21070@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <1834151.lrAIDRMoJM@ralph.baldwin.cx> References: <201505241607.t4OG7C7b073936@svn.freebsd.org> <3590632.VFQBH2fsZP@ralph.baldwin.cx> <20150525151339.GM1394@zxy.spb.ru> <1834151.lrAIDRMoJM@ralph.baldwin.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:32:41PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday, May 25, 2015 06:13:39 PM Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 10:40:09AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > > Some other related questions are: can we revive print/acroread now and or > > > use a 64-bit flash plugin after these changes? > > > > I am still use print/acroread. > > As I know removing print/acroread irrelevant to linuxator. > > This is will by security reasson. > > I am don't open suspicious pdf from suspicious source and just ignore > > this removing. > > I mean more if these updates allow us to update to a newer version of > print/acroread that would no longer be vulnerable (if such a thing exists) > whether 32- or 64-bit. Currenly I don't see any linux in Acrobat Reader support OS: https://get.adobe.com/reader/otherversions/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150525172734.GR21070>