Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 11:15:10 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: TM4525@aol.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run? Message-ID: <20041007181509.GA10199@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <bf.477daa3e.2e96e0af@aol.com> References: <bf.477daa3e.2e96e0af@aol.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 02:10:55PM -0400, TM4525@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 10/7/04 1:15:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > kris@obsecurity.org writes: > On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 12:41:28PM -0400, TM4525@aol.com wrote: > > In a message dated 10/7/04 10:17:47 AM Eastern Daylight Time, obscurity > Kris > > writes: > > Well, it's vast :) > > Kris > > We're waiting..5.3 is in beta and ready for your tests. Other benchmarks > > show very good results compared to 4.x. > > > > Kris > > ------------------------------------------ > > > > Quite a bunch of scientists on the FreeBSD team these days, eh? :) > > > > why don't you post some of these impressive benchmarks to substantiate > > your seemingly flimsy position? On a single processor system please, for > > the 99% of us who don't use SMP. Hopefully the only good reason to run > > 5.x won't be if you run 4 processor systems. > > Already done so. > > Kris > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Is it really too difficult for you to post a pointer or reference for those > of us who > don't have the time to spend our entire lives reading mailing lists archives? Uh, it was in a reply to your message. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBZYetWry0BWjoQKURArHWAKDGjFqDxv3PObfiPspx5f81JET19wCdECGS eyJg4tLvEDV8umeUYeoUcGI= =YOrI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041007181509.GA10199>