Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 14:53:26 +0100 From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de> To: cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: SSE2 intrinsics: gcc46 vs. clang contradiction Message-ID: <20131106135326.GB29109@britannica.bec.de> In-Reply-To: <A7CD3ADC-872C-40D7-B48A-C0C1A8FA885A@FreeBSD.org> References: <20131101124645.GA73456@regency.nsu.ru> <20131101154320.GA11359@regency.nsu.ru> <52742115.9010404@pathscale.com> <A7CD3ADC-872C-40D7-B48A-C0C1A8FA885A@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 01:07:47AM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> Index: tools/clang/lib/Headers/emmintrin.h
> ===================================================================
> --- tools/clang/lib/Headers/emmintrin.h (revision 193039)
> +++ tools/clang/lib/Headers/emmintrin.h (working copy)
> @@ -1366,7 +1366,7 @@ _mm_movepi64_pi64(__m128i __a)
> }
>
> static __inline__ __m128i __attribute__((__always_inline__, __nodebug__))
> -_mm_movpi64_pi64(__m64 __a)
> +_mm_movpi64_epi64(__m64 __a)
> {
> return (__m128i){ (long long)__a, 0 };
> }
>
> Is this OK?
Comparing the naming schema of the others, this looks good.
Joerg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131106135326.GB29109>