Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:52:19 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: UFS SU+J Message-ID: <82124F91-99C5-481E-A509-62BAAF64D1A9@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <iuhj45$lr1$1@dough.gmane.org> References: <BANLkTin-t-FLH-nSfCU0T4ncUGuea%2BdP4Q@mail.gmail.com> <8D25FDEA-9F87-4132-9DAA-1982B1DA72B2@lists.zabbadoz.net> <BANLkTinN5c1_r=DFnEFKvm=3dFT2m3DDag@mail.gmail.com> <iuhj45$lr1$1@dough.gmane.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Jun 30, 2011, at 4:28 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 29/06/2011 23:03, Mark Saad wrote: > >> The svn sources are here http://svn.freebsd.org/base/projects/suj/8/ . >> >> Why would suj not make it into 8-STABLE ? > > It is a too large patch, and it changes a lot of important, known and > working code (like softupdates). In other words, it's too risky. > I'm preparing to put it into large-scale deployment at Yahoo on FreeBSD 7. It wasn't ready for production until the latest round of fixes from Jeff and Kirk. Scotthome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?82124F91-99C5-481E-A509-62BAAF64D1A9>