Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:52:19 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: UFS SU+J Message-ID: <82124F91-99C5-481E-A509-62BAAF64D1A9@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <iuhj45$lr1$1@dough.gmane.org> References: <BANLkTin-t-FLH-nSfCU0T4ncUGuea%2BdP4Q@mail.gmail.com> <8D25FDEA-9F87-4132-9DAA-1982B1DA72B2@lists.zabbadoz.net> <BANLkTinN5c1_r=DFnEFKvm=3dFT2m3DDag@mail.gmail.com> <iuhj45$lr1$1@dough.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 30, 2011, at 4:28 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 29/06/2011 23:03, Mark Saad wrote: > >> The svn sources are here http://svn.freebsd.org/base/projects/suj/8/ . >> >> Why would suj not make it into 8-STABLE ? > > It is a too large patch, and it changes a lot of important, known and > working code (like softupdates). In other words, it's too risky. > I'm preparing to put it into large-scale deployment at Yahoo on FreeBSD 7. It wasn't ready for production until the latest round of fixes from Jeff and Kirk. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?82124F91-99C5-481E-A509-62BAAF64D1A9>