Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 17:21:56 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>, "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why no CDR ioctls for SCSI cds? Message-ID: <20000822172155.S86398@lucifer.bart.nl> In-Reply-To: <200008220647.AAA02074@harmony.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 12:47:42AM -0600 References: <20000821104114.A67935@panzer.kdm.org> <14753.42672.286077.409965@guru.mired.org> <20000821163458.A70871@panzer.kdm.org> <14753.47379.141329.994631@guru.mired.org> <20000821175657.A71753@panzer.kdm.org> <14753.50849.16035.805395@guru.mired.org> <20000821212517.B73232@panzer.kdm.org> <200008220607.AAA01652@harmony.village.org> <14754.8253.80322.822607@guru.mired.org> <200008220647.AAA02074@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-On [20000822 08:50], Warner Losh (imp@village.org) wrote: > >Actually, the real reason is that MMC drives that mostly support the >standard, but do it wrong in ways that are hard to detect. Those are >going to be the worst to try to support. There are some drives out >there that just hang when you issue them certain MMC commands, as an >example. They shouldn't but they do and you have to be careful not to >send them these commands. This got parsed by me as: mmc-quirk.h It wouldn't be hard to keep it tracked in a quirk file as per the SCSI disk quirk file. But I am not sure it is elegant. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> VIA Net.Works The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best http://www.via-net-works.nl There is no joy in smallness. Joy is in the infinite... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000822172155.S86398>