Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Jun 1998 21:45:02 +0800
From:      Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>
To:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-sys@FreeBSD.ORG, dt@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/msdosfs msdosfs_vnops.c 
Message-ID:  <199806101345.VAA06264@spinner.netplex.com.au>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 10 Jun 1998 22:09:31 %2B1000." <199806101209.WAA17030@godzilla.zeta.org.au> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans wrote:

[..]
> Chflags doesn't have so much history beind not returning EOPNOTSUPP, but
> EOPNOTSUPP is not mentioned in chflags.2 and EINVAL is documented as the
> error for fchflags() on a socket.

EOPNOTSUPP is what is returned by the "other" BSD's.  I feel that there is 
a difference between giving a nonsense (invalid) argument, and the flags 
case where the backing fs can't support the valid request you've made.

> Bruce

Cheers,
-Peter





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806101345.VAA06264>