Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 23:52:24 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: ben@rosengart.com Cc: Andre Oppermann <oppermann@pipeline.ch>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/3.0-19980923-BETA/ Message-ID: <199809241552.XAA21423@spinner.netplex.com.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 24 Sep 1998 10:25:49 -0400." <Pine.GSO.4.02.9809241025070.7622-100000@echonyc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Snob Art Genre wrote: > On Thu, 24 Sep 1998, Peter Wemm wrote: > > > Would this be useful? Too much? Too little? THis is different to what > > we had before where commits to all branches were lumped in together. > > This sounds good, except I think one should be able to get src commits > without docs commits. docs commits are pretty rare (compared to src and ports commits).. I was thinking about the situation where one could end up with 30 cvs-xyz lists again. But yes, I could understand cvs-doc and cvs-www being desirable to be seperate. > Ben > > "You have your mind on computers, it seems." > Cheers, -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809241552.XAA21423>