Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 16:02:35 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Switching /etc/*.db from bdb to tinycdb Message-ID: <20120502140235.GA91732@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <20120502123149.GI31034@azathoth.lan> References: <20120502114115.GG31034@azathoth.lan> <CA%2BhQ2%2Bgv%2BQ7SXbK-G5Lybjt4XOF_b3EvyxtQiOCL7pGxmgWRcg@mail.gmail.com> <20120502123149.GI31034@azathoth.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 02:31:49PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: ... > > > Why importing to libc? to allow all the get*ent to parse the /etc/*.db > > > files > > > > > > > just curious, where do we have the bdb 1.85 routines now ? > > Are they all in libc, or split between libc and libutil ? > > All in libc ok then it makes sense to preserve the structure and have everything in libc as des suggested. Just a curiosity again, any estimate of code size ? cheers luigi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120502140235.GA91732>