Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:23:27 -0500 From: Hiten Pandya <hiten@unixdaemons.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: vnode locking question. Message-ID: <20030207172327.GA23165@unixdaemons.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0302061052200.97117-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> References: <XFMail.20030206111319.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0302061052200.97117-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:53:08AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote the words in effect of: > > > On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > > On 05-Feb-2003 Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > > > Is there ever a case when a vnode is locked for longer than the duration > > > of the syscall that locked it? > > > > Shouldn't be. That would be a bug I believe. Userland threads should > > never hold any kernel locks. > > That's what I think too but I just thought I'd ask.. > (NFS worries me a bit) > If It did, wouldn't that give a panic() with something like: "panic: mutex held on exit to userland..." ... or something like that? -- Hiten Pandya (hiten@unixdaemons.com, hiten@uk.FreeBSD.org) http://www.unixdaemons.com/~hiten/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030207172327.GA23165>