Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:49:17 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When will ZFS become stable? Message-ID: <flr7rl$6f7$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <47811967.3050906@FreeBSD.org> References: <fll63b$j1c$1@ger.gmane.org> <20080106141157.I105@fledge.watson.org> <flr0np$euj$2@ger.gmane.org> <20080106170452.L105@fledge.watson.org> <flr340$mum$1@ger.gmane.org> <47811336.4060605@FreeBSD.org> <flr4vc$sud$1@ger.gmane.org> <47811967.3050906@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Kris Kennaway wrote: > Ivan Voras wrote: >> Kris Kennaway wrote: >> >>> What you appear to be still missing is that ZFS also causes memory >>> exhaustion panics when run on 32-bit Solaris. >> >> Citation needed. I'm interested. > > Reports on the zfs-discuss mailing list. Thanks for the pointer. I'm looking at the archives. So far I've found this: http://www.archivum.info/zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org/2007-07/msg00016.html which doesn't mention panics; and this: http://www.archivum.info/zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org/2007-07/msg00054.html which didn't get any replies but the backtrace doesn't include anything resembling a malloc-like call. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHgSKzldnAQVacBcgRAkGmAKCDYOMbWXcSSaJtuWo7YS8MjSNlcwCePKAq 9q/fY9HjXfbs5Q7jXAgBjuM= =W2hT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?flr7rl$6f7$1>