Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 18 Feb 1996 11:29:23 +0100 (MET)
From:      J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers)
Subject:   Re: Is "immutable" supposed to be a good idea?
Message-ID:  <199602181029.LAA06523@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <199602180608.RAA29273@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Feb 18, 96 05:08:54 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Bruce Evans wrote:

> The immututable flags are always honoured.  In secure mode, you can't
> turn then off.  In highly secure mode, you can write to the disk
> directly to turn them off.

You should not.

INIT(8)                 FreeBSD System Manager's Manual                INIT(8)

NAME
     init - process control initialization

     2     Highly secure mode - same as secure mode, plus disks are always
           read-only whether mounted or not.  This level precludes tampering
           with filesystems by unmounting them, but also inhibits running
           newfs(8) while the system is multi-user.

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602181029.LAA06523>