Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:45:33 -0600
From:      Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions]
Message-ID:  <20070426214533.GJ87931@demeter.hydra>
In-Reply-To: <20070426210346.GC20176@oberon.njm.f2s.com>
References:  <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> <20070425200521.GD81828@demeter.hydra> <20070425152547.S12335@wonkity.com> <20070425214420.GA82659@demeter.hydra> <20070426190319.GA20176@oberon.njm.f2s.com> <20070426204335.GG87931@demeter.hydra> <20070426210346.GC20176@oberon.njm.f2s.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 10:03:46PM +0100, N.J. Mann wrote:
> 
> Okay, I think I understand. :-)
> 
> I think the misunderstanding was because I am using mutt very
> differently from you.  I have each list I am subscribed to filtered into
> its own mail box by procmail.  I have listed all of these mailing lists
> in mutt's subscribed setting.  I also have status_on_top set and
> pager_index_lines set to 10.  The up shot of all this is that I know
> which mailing list I am reading because it is listed in the status line.
> 
> Separate mail boxes for each mailing list just makes more sense to me.
> :-)

Yeah, that makes a big difference.

For me, filtering into separate mailboxes would just ensure that I end
up ignoring some of my mailing lists for long periods of time.

-- 
CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ]
Dr. Ron Paul: "Liberty has meaning only if we still believe in it when
terrible things happen and a false government security blanket beckons."



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070426214533.GJ87931>