Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 18:34:53 -0500 (EST) From: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu> To: hasty@rah.star-gate.com (Amancio Hasty) Cc: jmb@freefall.freebsd.org, scrappy@hub.org, ejs@bfd.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, taob@risc.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge) Message-ID: <199703022334.SAA00745@crh.cl.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <199703022332.PAA07875@rah.star-gate.com> from Amancio Hasty at "Mar 2, 97 03:32:29 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> FreeBSD-1.0's gcc used to rock in terms of compilation it was at
> least twice as fast as the lastest gcc , and of course it didn't
> have any of the Pentium optimizations which may account for its
> current slowness -- well I am just giving it the benefit of the
> doubt. Someone ought to really look into what the hell is going
> on with gcc.
So are you going to build a 1.0 binary for us? :)
-Crh
Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@msu.edu
http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703022334.SAA00745>