Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:19:33 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r230207 - in head/sys: netinet sys Message-ID: <20120119191932.GB12760@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120119170755.GE23733@lonesome.com> References: <201201160953.q0G9rPp8026625@svn.freebsd.org> <20120119170755.GE23733@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:07:55AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: M> I had kind of hoped that before support was dropped, we had generated M> a strategy for dealing with the port breakages that my -exp run detected. M> This is disappointing. These three ports were false positives. They do not utilize SIOCSIFADDR as ioctl() argument. They are not broken by the r230207. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120119191932.GB12760>