Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:10:36 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@iname.com> To: Chris Faulhaber <jedgar@fxp.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make release needs too much ports installed Message-ID: <20010319231036.A2038@iname.com> In-Reply-To: <20010319104406.A19463@peitho.fxp.org>; from jedgar@fxp.org on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:44:06AM -0500 References: <20010319223215.A1110@iname.com> <20010319104406.A19463@peitho.fxp.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:44:06AM -0500, Chris Faulhaber wrote: > > I've built world using 3.5-STABLE sources and run 'make release' > > with RELEASETAG=RELENG_3. I noticed that it installs some ports > > (my ports tree is fresh), f.e. docproj. Ok, I understand, but > > docproj depends of eps2png and eps2png depends of ghostscript. > > I've set JADETEX=no to avoid building of TeX, but still cannot get rid of > > ghostscript. Does one REALLY need to build and install ghostscript > > just to build FreeBSD release? > > > > No. You do not have to build the docs (and their dependent ports). > See /usr/src/release/Makefile: > > # Uncomment this to disable the doc.1 target. It is also an ERROR > # to set NOPORTS and not set NODOC since docs depend on ports. > #NODOC= YES > #NOPORTS= YES Thank you. But my question was: is ghostscript really used while building docs? Eugene Grosbein To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010319231036.A2038>