Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 12:12:36 +0000 From: Lexi Winter <ivy@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org, pkgbase@freebsd.org Subject: Re: more pkgbase reviewers required Message-ID: <acZ0NEYBlYl459ME@amaryllis.le-fay.org> In-Reply-To: <5990d939-a3a0-403b-e419-949043559c0f@bluerosetech.com> References: <acPbI7THuJb5h4pp@amaryllis.le-fay.org> <5990d939-a3a0-403b-e419-949043559c0f@bluerosetech.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com wrote in <5990d939-a3a0-403b-e419-949043559c0f@bluerosetech.com>: > On 2026-03-25 5:54, Lexi Winter wrote: > > at this point, it's extremely difficult to get any pkgbase-related > > changes reviewed in Phabricator, which is an issue since we're now > > pushing pkgbase as the default method for installing the system. > > What is the current state of FreeBSD dogfooding pkgbase? as far as i'm aware, no cluster machines are currently using pkgbase. based on bug reports, i'd say a reasonable number of developers are using pkgbase on their development systems, but this is probably significantly less than a majority of developers. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQSyjTg96lp3RifySyn1nT63mIK/YAUCacZ0MQAKCRD1nT63mIK/ YMI1AQDwtG+s1aZTEIphwbQgpM21jrye/bzAHmwTzLXmrHiCbQD+NlI6ef7drKWU zdftHA7q6v48rU/E6EcCSJmxV0jaJgw= =F+ls -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?acZ0NEYBlYl459ME>