Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 07:49:36 -0500 From: "Eric L. Hernes" <erich@lodgenet.com> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, erich@lodgenet.com Subject: Re: does HAVE_FPU really work? Message-ID: <199608221249.HAA04765@jake.lodgenet.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 22 Aug 1996 17:53:37 %2B1000." <199608220753.RAA20229@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans writes:
>>SuffFindDeps (e_acos.o)
>> trying e_acos.s...not there
>> trying e_acos.S...got it
>> using existing source /usr/src/lib/msun/src/e_acos.c
>> applying .c -> .o to "e_acos.o"
>
>>looks like it finds e_acos.S, but uses e_acos.c anyway.
> didn't find
>
>It shouldn't use e_acos.c, since e_acos.c isn't among the source
>files if HAVE_FPU is defined (see the Makefile).
>
Yes, I saw that. I even put in a
t:
@echo ${SRCS}
# make t
that spit out the .S's as expected, it just didn't compile 'em.
Also, when I rm'ed the .c's that corresponding had .S's
`make -ds e_acos.o' resulted in:
SuffFindDeps (e_acos.o)
trying e_acos.s...not there
trying e_acos.S...got it
applying .S -> .o to "e_acos.o"
SuffFindDeps (e_acos.S)
cc -D_MULTI_LIBM -D_POSIX_MODE -D_IEEE_LIBM -c /src/build/msun/i387/e_acos.S
-o e_acos.o
It looks like make is using `e_acos' as a root, and finding `e_acos.S'
and `e_acos.c', and picking `e_acos.c', regardless of what ${SRCS}
is.
>Bruce
>
still confused,
eric.
--
erich@lodgenet.com
http://rrnet.com/~erich erich@rrnet.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608221249.HAA04765>