Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 02:38:42 -0400 From: "George V. Neville-Neil" <gnn@neville-neil.com> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>, "George V. Neville-Neil" <gnn@FreeBSD.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r297225 - in head/sys: net netinet netinet6 Message-ID: <56F4DCF2.9040505@neville-neil.com> In-Reply-To: <20160324203117.GY2616@FreeBSD.org> References: <201603240754.u2O7suvM006925@repo.freebsd.org> <20160324203117.GY2616@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/24/16 04:31 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 07:54:56AM +0000, George V. Neville-Neil wrote: > G> Author: gnn > G> Date: Thu Mar 24 07:54:56 2016 > G> New Revision: 297225 > G> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/297225 > G> > G> Log: > G> FreeBSD previously provided route caching for TCP (and UDP). Re-add > G> route caching for TCP, with some improvements. In particular, invalidate > G> the route cache if a new route is added, which might be a better match. > G> The cache is automatically invalidated if the old route is deleted. > G> > G> Submitted by: Mike Karels > G> Reviewed by: gnn > G> Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4306 > > I'm quite surprised to see this checked in, taking into account that the > D4306 has strong disagreement from melifaro@. > > So, now we got two aids for poor routing: TCP route caching & flowtable. > Given that melifaro@ has not responded to emails from several folks for several weeks I pushed this in so that we could a) break the tie and b) have a place to start for improvement. The status quo was unacceptable. Best, George
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56F4DCF2.9040505>