Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 09:19:02 -0700 From: David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU> To: Charles Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.7-RELEASE crash [file system] Message-ID: <20021021161902.GA396@HAL9000.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <003a01c27849$6367d4d0$0301a8c0@prime> References: <20021019130404.A25131-100000@edge.foundation.invalid> <001901c27798$d033df70$0301a8c0@prime> <3DB2399F.3060900@zbzoom.net> <003a01c27849$6367d4d0$0301a8c0@prime>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Charles Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>: > PS: Arguably, people should be building with "-g -O" all of the time, even > in production. GCC tends to generate the most reliable code for that > combination of options, as those are exercised the most frequently. GCC specifically does *not* generate code that is any more or less reliable when you use -g. The GCC folks are fairly picky about that rule. As for optimization, I've never been bitten by any bugs in either -O0 or -O, but in theory -O0 would save you from any bugs in the optimizer. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021021161902.GA396>