Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:04:00 +1000
From:      Norberto Meijome <freebsd@meijome.net>
To:        "Ronald Klop" <ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org>
Cc:        freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Q) eclipse 3.2 (Callisto)
Message-ID:  <20060829150400.739ae7d2@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <op.te0bpbbu8527sy@guido.klop.ws>
References:  <970c0a6b0607280839qc05e2b8p51118955745b7cda@mail.gmail.com> <20060828161538.GI89053@vision.anyware> <44F332FF.5050809@appriss.com> <op.te0bpbbu8527sy@guido.klop.ws>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:45:01 +0200
"Ronald Klop" <ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org> wrote:

> Maybe it is possible to repocopy eclipse to eclipse31. And change the  
> depending ports for the new location.
> Just an idea. Don't know how much work it is.

or, given that most ports that depend on 3.1.2 wont work out of the box with
3.2 , just call this one eclipse32 ? 

I remember seeing an email on this list suggesting against doing any of
this.... but IMVHO, is better to have both out there and then have a reason to
upgrade all the plugins ... otherwise I can see we may have a gap when we have
java/eclipse (3.2) but no compatible plugins available yet....

_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome

unzip ; strip ; touch ; grep ; find ; finger ; mount ; fsck ; more ; yes ;
fsck ; umount ; sleep

I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060829150400.739ae7d2>