Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 17:50:26 GMT From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/71359: /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf contains broken CXXFLAGS Message-ID: <200409041750.i84HoQtx035444@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/71359; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: Chris Pepper <pepper@reppep.com> Cc: Paul Mather <paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu>, bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/71359: /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf contains broken CXXFLAGS Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 20:47:44 +0300 On 2004-09-04 11:31, Chris Pepper <pepper@reppep.com> wrote: > > Of course, but the examples should all be valid. This one > prevents make buildworld, so should be replaced by something that > doesn't. True, true. > > # CXXFLAGS controls the compiler settings used when compiling C++ code. > > # Note that CXXFLAGS is initially set to the value of CFLAGS. If you > > wish > > # to add to CXXFLAGS value, "+=" must be used rather than "=". Using > > "=" > > # alone will remove the often needed contents of CFLAGS from CXXFLAGS. > > +# For a description of the options recognized by the GNU C++ compiler > > +# please refer to the c++(1) manpage and the info documentation of GCC. > > # > > -#CXXFLAGS+= -fmemoize-lookups -fsave-memoized > > +#CXXFLAGS+= -O -pipe > > Except that's provided already with the example of CFLAGS, so > would make sense iff CFLAGS had another example value. I don't use C++ so much, so perhaps I'm not the right person to choose a "nice set of default flags" for this. Any ideas from you, Chris?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200409041750.i84HoQtx035444>