Date: Sun, 22 Feb 1998 23:26:55 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: More breakage in -current as a result of header frobbing. Message-ID: <199802230626.XAA01194@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 22 Feb 1998 10:52:52 MST." <199802221752.KAA24429@mt.sri.com> References: <199802221752.KAA24429@mt.sri.com> <199802221440.HAA24031@mt.sri.com> <27201.888168269@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199802221752.KAA24429@mt.sri.com> Nate Williams writes: : We got here by people who put out quality/tested software. This appears : to no longer be as important as it once was to many people, including : many people in core. I find quality very important. I haven't seen the quality of -current be any worse than the -current of other BSDs that i build and use. I too am worried when people make changes they haven't tested. However, -current will be broken from time to time because of the nature of the beast. if there are those that break it too often, they should be hassled. I'm just not seeing one person who has done that. Just different people who have accidentally messed up all at the same time. what am i missing? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802230626.XAA01194>