Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 12:31:04 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: "Dag-Erling =?utf-8?q?Sm=C3=B8rgrav?=" <des@des.no> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r259010 - in head/sys: conf powerpc/fpu Message-ID: <201312131231.04749.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <86a9g5uofn.fsf@nine.des.no> References: <201312052149.rB5LnEcT011811@svn.freebsd.org> <201312051650.26379.jhb@freebsd.org> <86a9g5uofn.fsf@nine.des.no>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Friday, December 13, 2013 3:48:12 am Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > > LINT64 is yet another kernel config covered by 'make tinderbox', but not by > > the periodic tinderbox. It is probably worth adding to the periodic tinderbox > > (someday it'd be nice if the two tinderboxes built the same set of things). > > Some day it would be nice if people talked to me directly instead of > sniping from the sidelines. Ah, but when people have raised this exact issue before (that tcbuild and 'make tinderbox' build different things), you have blown them off repeatedly. > The root issue here is that "make LINT" is poorly implemented, so under > some circumstances (including the tinderbox and, if I read the code > correctly, 'make universe'), the LINT64 config is never generated. Agreed on that front. > Oh, and 'make tinderbox' should die. No, it is very developer friendly as it Just Works(tm) as a single command from an existing source tree checkout. It also happens to build more of the tree than the periodic tinderbox (by building more kernel configs, albeit doing quite a bit of duplicate work for platforms like arm in the process). -- John Baldwinhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201312131231.04749.jhb>