Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 23:54:30 +0000 From: "Li, Qing" <qing.li@bluecoat.com> To: Ingo Flaschberger <if@xip.at> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: interface ip arp Message-ID: <10E473DB-A690-4468-953A-08D87AE07F68@bluecoat.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1105020149570.27379@filebunker.xip.at> References: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1104140140240.8693@filebunker.xip.at>, <alpine.LRH.2.00.1105020149570.27379@filebunker.xip.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
That's not the expected behavior, probably a bug, I will take a look ... -- Qing On May 1, 2011, at 4:51 PM, "Ingo Flaschberger" <if@xip.at> wrote: >> is it expected behaviour that the static, permanent arp entry of the int= erface ip disappear after ifdown/ifup at 8.x release? >>=20 >> ifconfig em0 10.20.20.1/24 >> arp -an | grep 10.20.20.1 >> ? (10.20.20.1) at xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx on em0 permanent [ethernet] >> ifconfig em0 down >> ifconfig em0 up >> arp -an | grep 10.20.20.1 >> nothing >=20 > resend this "question" - as there was no respone. >=20 > Kind regards, > Ingo Flaschberger >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?10E473DB-A690-4468-953A-08D87AE07F68>